League ecosystem: co-building regional AIGC distribution hubs
The League program targets key cities nationwide, together with regional MCNs, university labs, industrial parks, and teams with local execution muscle, to recruit a single city league partner: backed by HQ platform APIs and an operations toolkit, we jointly build a regional AIGC content distribution and commercialization hub and share growth upside.
The pilot emphasizes verifiable local delivery and review cadence: HQ provides training, API SLAs, ops dashboards, and risk templates; the city side owns pipeline growth, campaigns, and customer success. Both sides align on three metrics—content throughput, conversion funnel, settlement cycle—via shared dashboards to reduce coordination friction.
Commercial terms are governed by formal agreements. Expand below for six sections, compliance notes, and links to the news hub map.
Expand: positioning, onboarding, Q&A summary, and links
1. Positioning
A league partner is not a simple channel reseller but a city-node operating partner: within authorized geography and industry boundaries, they organize local production collaboration, sales, events, and after-sales handoff; HQ owns core product iteration, risk strategy, algorithms, and national brand backing—a two-layer HQ + city operating model.
2. Three core benefits
- City-exclusive mandate: one league partner per city in principle (or split by administrative unit per commercial evaluation), with exclusive operating rights and co-branding within scope—reducing destructive intra-city bidding and protecting long-term ROI expectations.
- End-to-end technical & ops support: product training, API docs, ops SOPs, marketing templates, and Q&A channels; major upgrades and risk-rule changes are announced early with migration/rollback guidance to lower local trial-and-error cost.
- Long-term revenue & transparent settlement: under compliance, contractual revenue-sharing on subscriptions, value-add services, and delivered projects; consoles show orders, settlement cycles, and reconciliation detail with multi-role permissions to reduce manual reconciliation.
3. Who should apply
Organizations with local customer or content ecosystems are preferred—regional MCNs/guilds, university incubators, park operators, mature SaaS channels, gov-enterprise IT vendors, etc. Teams need basic commercial and delivery capability, alignment with data security and content compliance, and willingness to invest in city operations rather than short-term arbitrage.
4. Collaboration & compliance boundaries
All external messaging, quotes, and contracts must comply with advertising law, IP rules, and generative-AI service regulations; collection and storage of user data and model-call logs must follow HQ data classification rules. Do not alter core algorithm behavior without authorization or resell platform capability to non-registered entities. Breach handling follows the signed City League Cooperation Agreement and annexes.
5. Next steps
After an initial read of the local market and team fit, use the news hub’s League section for benefit diagrams and the nationwide city recruitment layout (map), then book commercial discussion on exclusivity, pilot window, and revenue share. Buttons below jump to the corresponding anchors.
6. FAQ & risk notes (summary)
Pilot & exclusivity: scope follows geographic and industry boundaries in the agreement; splitting the same metro cluster requires commercial evaluation and written HQ approval—avoid verbal promises.
Data & content: retention and cross-border transfer of personal data and model logs must follow HQ classification and local regulation; keep audit trails for external creatives for spot checks and traceability.